Accounting - Organizations & Society Unstructured employment sample

Question: 1. Talk about a portion of the reasons why directors keep on utilizing unstructured work interviews in spite of the bottomless proof that they are not valuable for anticipating future employment performance.2. Portray the idea of straight dynamic. Likewise, examine how a direct dynamic model could have helped you in making a past decision.3. Bazerman and Moore recommend that we ought to comprehend the predispositions of others. Talk about this idea as far as why it is significant for us to comprehend other people groups' inclinations. In your conversation, center around how you may have the option to improve your dynamic in a gathering setting.4. Depict the idea of analogical thinking. At that point, thinking about your last buy choice, talk about how analogical thinking could have helped you to improve your choice and increment your fulfillment with the item or administration that you bought. Answer: Examine a portion of the reasons why directors keep on utilizing unstructured work interviews notwithstanding the bottomless proof that they are not helpful for anticipating future employment execution. The Formless activity gatherings notice the example of conversations where the inquiries are changed abandoned on in what way the candidate counters to the style and substance of cross examinations. The clarifications referenced by the administrators or chiefs articulate about the vibe of distinction and fairness with fluctuated sort of cross examinations that leaves insignificant odds of leaving any indispensable question. Furthermore, the unstructured meetings endeavor to limit the impression of tension and frenzy and build an adaptable stage (Smolkin, 2015). Thirdly, the unpremeditated strategy incorporates the cross examinations which may help to perceive the particular capabilities and abilities pertinent for the huge position. Fourthly, the crucial parts of specific concerns may show up in spotlight which could be excluded in the expert or scholarly proposals. The unimaginable layers of human brain are carefully created through the psychometric valuations of open meetings in LT that talks about the inactive issues of mind boggling or agonizing conditions of musings (Farago, 2010). The most energizing actuality announces the highlights of money related and efficient components while meeting a candidate, but then does not have the presentation of viable experience required for anticipating the potential points of view of calling. Portray the idea of direct dynamic. Additionally, talk about how a straight dynamic model could have helped you in settling on a past choice The technique for building a choice alludes to extra decisions to be estimated just as the determination must guarantee the head probabilities of achievement or efficiency notwithstanding the ideal type of acknowledgment of points and goals for obtaining the administrations or ancient rarity. In this manner, the choice structure method includes picking an open door in the midst of various arrangement of factors with unknown outcomes. The direct type of creation of choice determines the portrayals where the appraisal is set up with consideration of the result that ponders the worries of contemplation (Yoneda Celaschi, 2013). Appropriately, the decision with incredible expectant stuff is favored above other measures. The manufacture of direct choice exceedingly remains on the prompts that are abstract to explore the course of scholarly speculation in arranging a predefined choice. Regardless of whether direct example of choice is very unswerving as it bypasses the negative angles, it e nds up being trying to choose the standout track while there stay indistinguishable stuffs with voluminous substitutes with the proportionate possibilities. Rendering to the proclamations of Tu. (2014), direct choice comprises portion of the rational show of collecting the considerations of choice universally with fertile signs. The procedure of straight choice would have encouraged me to shape intelligent and logical decisions grounded on scientific translation of breaking down the nutritive incentive close by the expense of cheddar burger from Mac Donalds while picking to choose the gainful decision. Bazerman and Moore recommend that we ought to comprehend the predispositions of others. Talk about this idea as far as why it is significant for us to comprehend other people groups' inclinations. In your conversation, center around how you may have the option to improve your dynamic in a gathering setting. There are various issues that sway on choice helpful course. The predisposition, purposely or coincidentally contacts the standards of decisions concerning the sensation and achievements that connects with the characters. During the time spent making choice, it is imperative to grasp ones inclinations or biases remembering others to outline the definitive methodologies for the right course. It sanctions us to recognize the genuine demeanor or viewpoint of people (Sobel, 2014). Notwithstanding, some faculty in a working environment may uncover the urging highlights of realities to underwrite their situation in a predetermined setting while, others probably won't have the option to depict the whole issue inferable from ignorance and inaccessibility of data. The inclinations or names of unfair issues anticipate the essentialness of notions and convictions that sway on the straight out decisions and firm difficulties Gazal Sulitzeanu, 2010). I would have the option to increase my inventi ve and pertinent examination of the discernible idea of the people while setting the objectives of choice with respect to the gathering execution. This would strengthen the intensity of perceiving the genuine points of view of mindfulness recognizing the benefits and negative marks of conduct morals. Depict the idea of analogical thinking. At that point, thinking about your last buy choice, examine how analogical thinking could have helped you to improve your choice and increment your fulfillment with the item or administration that you bought. Analogical thinking stands widely in understanding the considerations and points of view of people. The declarations on twofold or included worries in unwinding stunts are strongly applied as a faultless component in maneuvering the speculation of premises in policymaking circumstances. The similar highlights of the indistinguishable issues or beginnings uncover the establishment of relationship that is expressly executed in refering to the reasons for sensible occasions or points of interest. The philosophy indicates the vision of deriving inductions from the coherent unfurling of layers of realities (Davis, 2012). The mindfulness and comprehension of brand picture and item esteem including the after deals offices of last buy convinced me select the Redme versatile set from MI stores through online exchange. Figure: Model of Analogical Reasoning (Source: Gohari, 2014) References Bazerman, M. Moore, D. (2011). Is it time for evaluator freedom yet?. Bookkeeping, Organizations And Society, 36(4-5), 310-312. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.07.004 Burtscher, M. Meyer, B. (2014). Advancing great choices: How administrative center influences bunch data handling and dynamic. Gathering Processes Intergroup Relations, 17(5), 663-681. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430214522138 Davis, K. (2012). Analogical thinking in a model of future-situated inspiration and self-guideline. English, L. (2012). Scientific and analogical thinking of youthful students. New York: Routledge. Farago, B. (2010). Candidate responses to organized and unstructured enlistment interviews. Gazal-Ayal, O. Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2010). Release My People: Ethnic In-Group Bias in Judicial Decisions-Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment. Diary Of Empirical Legal Studies, 7(3), 403-428. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01183.x Gohari,. (2014). Improving dynamic. Slideshare.net. Recovered 29 September 2016, from https://www.slideshare.net/omidazg/improving-dynamic 40326384 Hullermeier, E. (2012). Adaptable vulnerability the board. Berlin: Springer. Robson, A. (2012). Analogical thinking and working memory. Durham University. Simmonds-Moore, C. (2014). Investigating the perceptual predispositions related with accepting and distrusting in paranormal wonders. Cognizance And Cognition, 28, 30-46. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.004 Smolkin, A. (2015). Mutilations of Self-Descriptions in Unstructured Interviews: Sensitive Situation and Informants Self-Justification Strategies. RSR, 14(3), 64-79. https://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2015-3-64-79 Sobel, J. (2014). On the connection among individual and cooperative choices. Hypothetical Economics, 9(1), 163-185. https://dx.doi.org/10.3982/te1185 Tu, Y. (2014). Utilization of Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Network Meta-investigation. Clinical Decision Making, 34(7), 911-918. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989x14545789 Yoneda, K. Celaschi, W. (2013). An Utility Function to Solve Approximate Linear Equations for Decision Making. Dynamic In Manufacturing And Services, 7(1-2), 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.7494/dmms.2013.7.1.5

Throughout The Crucible many of the characters experience changes to th

All through The Crucible a considerable lot of the characters experience changes to their character. The adjustment in John Proctor is very conspicuous In Act IV Proctor says, ‘I can't mount the gibbet like a holy person. It is misrepresentation. I am not that man.’ At the finish of the play he goes to execution saying, ‘Now I do think I see some sliver of goodness in John Proctor.’ What has rolled out this improvement come to fruition? All through The Crucible a considerable lot of the characters experience changes to their character. The adjustment in John Proctor is very unmistakable and critical in the play. At the point when John says, ‘I can't mount the gibbet like a holy person. It is extortion. I am not that man’ he is certain that he wouldn't like to kick the bucket. Later on, while hanging tight for execution he says, ‘Now I do think I see some sliver of goodness in John Proctor which shows he is currently prepared to kick the bucket to express his value. This uncommon change from heathen to saint is incited in various manners. John adores Elizabeth extraordinarily and her suppositions mean a great deal to him. Towards the finish of the play, Elizabeth excuses John for his transgressions, which permits him to excuse himself. Elizabeth reveals to John that she’s never observed such a great amount of goodness on the planet; he understands he is Elizabeth’s case of flawlessness so acknowledges what must be done, so not to free this ‘perfect’ see. We can likewise observe that John thinks about Elizabeth’s musings as he inquires as to whether she figures he ought to admit. This too shows that he is a powerless man, who can't act without anyone else. John is compelled to make up his own brain, when Elizabeth won't help him. John considers just himself and consents to admit. When Danforth constrains him to name some other liable gatherings John will just discuss his own transgressions. John is a strict Christian ... ...ct. Seeing the composed admission makes everything genuine to him. The allurement of life brings another preliminary into John’s life, which he needs to battle against. The longing fore ‘more names’ in court carries home to him the power battle he has confronted. At where he needs to choose regardless of whether to lie or not, it is evidence of John’s genuineness that at this point he can't lie, however rather he tears his marked admission also, follows his companions to the scaffold. Obviously the ‘heat’ of his preliminaries has changed John from a heathen to a saint, and has demonstrated him to be the ‘good man’ of whom Elizabeth talks. The genuine John Proctor is a man who realizes whit is correct, regardless of whether he has not continuously done right and he is unequipped for contemptibility or narrow-mindedness. Plainly the adjustment in John Proctor has come about in view of the ‘real’ John Proctor approaching.

The Definitive Guide to Picking Up Women at a Bookstore

The Definitive Guide to Picking Up Women at a Bookstore While we at the Riot take some time off to rest and catch up on our  reading, were re-running some of our  favorite posts from the last several months. Enjoy our highlight reel, and well be back with new stuff on Monday, January 11th. This post originally ran September 14, 2015. _________________________ Why hello there. It looks like you’ve Googled “How to Pick Up Women at a Bookstore.” Before we begin, a brief moment of self-inquiry: Are you lonely? How lonely? Lonely enough to mine the web for articles written by content farmers posing as pickup artists? Do you view women as objects? Sex as conquest? Negging as a worthwhile form of human interaction? Has it occurred to you that maybe this is why you feel so alone all of the time? Don’t worry, we’re here to help! Follow these tips and we guarantee you’ll be able to walk into your nearest bookstore and pick up as many females as your heart desires. Best of all, you can continue to treat women as objects (and vice versa) while avoiding that pesky business of confronting your male chauvinism. According to a website called Manipudating, which is exactly what it sounds like, your first task is to find a women  who looks vulnerable, which is easy enough in a bookstore, where  women arent so quick to put their defenses up.  This is maybe good advice if you’re, say, organizing a jewel heist, but it’s really very gross as far as romance goes. No, the key to a great match â€" and this may be difficult to hear, Googler of pickup techniques â€" is to find someone who challenges your worldview, a person who forces you to consider yourself and others in a way that you’d previously not. (I know, ick) So here’s what you do: First, walk up to the bookstore clerk and say, “Hello, can you direct me to Toni Morrison.” You’ll want to stay on script â€" if you find yourself insulting the clerk’s bangs in the hope of lowering her self-worth so she might sleep with you, you’ve screwed up. Equally important is the follow up line: After you’ve been directed to the correct section, it’s critical that you say something along the lines of, “Thanks.” Now you’re standing beside a set of highly challenging books, written by one of the most intelligent women on Earth and the only living American to win The Nobel Prize in Literature. OK, deep breaths. You’ve laid the groundwork, selected the target, and now it’s time for the clincher. Reach out and pick one of those novels up by the spine â€" as for which one, I’d recommend Beloved, though you may also want to consult this guide to her work. Make your purchase, find a cozy place where you two can be alone, and bask in the triumphant glory of victory. Congratulations young grasshopper, you’ve just picked up your first woman at the bookstore. As any self-respecting player knows, it’s crucial to cast a wide net. One relationship, no matter how stimulating, is never going to satisfy all your cravings. Hustlers just aren’t programmed that way. Instead of limiting yourself with a “type,” try picking up as many different kinds of women as possible. If you’re looking for someone to travel the globe with, Valeria Luiselli’s Sidewalks is a must-read. Prefer someone with a biting sense of humor? Try Nora Ephron’s autobiographical novel Heartburn or Lorrie Moore’s collection of short stories Self-Help. Anne Tyler is a great choice for someone to bring home to the family, while Alison Bechdel is an equally great choice for someone you should probably keep far away from your family. For the modern man, short on time and attention, try Mira Gonzalezs recently-published Selected Tweets, a collection of funny and sad and heartfelt musings, each under 140 characters. Roxane Gay’s Bad Feminist is the best book of essays I’ve read in years, and she too has a book-deal-worthy Twitter. But maybe you consider yourself an old-school gentleman, a virtuous lad steadfast in his belief that love and morality will win out in the end. The dating landscape of 2015 just isn’t meant for a wholesome guy like you, what with Tinder and 3nder (that’s Tinder for threesomes) and Netflix Chill, so why not hook up with someone who better matches your classical aesthetic. For the ambitious, George Eliot’s Middlemarch is the quintessential Victorian doorstopper, widely regarded as one of the greatest novels of all time. Each of the three Brontë sisters earn a place in the canon as well, with Charlotte’s Jane Eyre taking aim at the Woman Question, something you’re sort of wrestling with in your own way, right? The point, belabored by now, is that there are plenty of fish in the sea â€" which is actually the name of like six dating sites â€" and even more women authors worth your time. Take my recommendations or don’t, just so long as you remember that sites like Manipudating are poison and the bookstore is not your personal singles cruise. Also, reading Toni Morrison will make you a better person.

Jimenez Surname Meaning and Family History

The Jimenez surname most commonly means son of Jimeno or Simà ³n, given names meaning gracious hearkening; snub-nosed. Jimenez is a very common surname in Asturias, Aragà ³n, Castile, Navarre, Extremadura, Murcia and Andalusia; most anciently in Navarre and Aragà ³n. Jimenez is the 26th most common Hispanic surname. Surname origin:  SpanishAlternate surname spellings:  Jimenes Famous People With the Surname Hà ©ctor Jimà ©nez: Mexican actorMelissa Jimenez: Mexican American singer and songwriter Where Is This Surname Most Common? As of January 2019, the Jimenez surname is the 173rd most common surname in the world, according to surname distribution information from  Forebears. It is most prevalent, based on a percentage of the population, in Costa Rica, where it ranks as the 3rd most common surname. It is also extremely common in the Dominican Republic (9th), Spain (11th), Colombia (17th), Mexico (20th) and Panama (23rd). WorldNames PublicProfiler  includes data from countries not included in Forebears, including Spain where Jimenez is extremely popular. Jimenez is particularly prevalent in Andalucia and La Rioja, Spain, followed by the Spanish regions of Castilla-La Mancha, Navarra, Madrid, Murcia, Extremadura, Castilla y Leà ³n, and Cataluà ±a. Genealogy Resources Jimenez family crest: Contrary to what you may hear, there is no such thing as a Jimenez family crest or coat of arms for the Jimenez surname.  Coats of arms are granted to individuals, not families, and may rightfully be used only by the uninterrupted male-line descendants of the person to whom the coat of arms was originally granted.Jimenez family genealogy forum: This free message board is focused on the descendants of Jimenez ancestors around the world. Search the forum for posts about your Jimenez ancestors, or join the forum and post your own queries.  FamilySearch: Explore over 3.6  million  results from digitized  historical records and lineage-linked family trees related to the Jimenez surname on this free website hosted by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.GeneaNet: Includes archival records, family trees, and other resources for individuals with the Jimenez surname, with a concentration on records and families from France and other European countrie s.The Jimenez genealogy and family tree page: Browse genealogy records and links to genealogical and historical records for individuals with the Jimenez surname from the website of Genealogy Today.Ancestry.com: Explore over 4  million digitized records and database entries, including census records, passenger lists, military records, land deeds, probates, wills and other records for the Jimenez surname on the subscription-based website, Ancestry.com References Cottle, Basil.  Penguin Dictionary of Surnames. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1967.Dorward, David.  Scottish Surnames. Collins Celtic (Pocket edition), 1998.Fucilla, Joseph.  Our Italian Surnames. Genealogical Publishing Company, 2003.Hanks, Patrick and Flavia Hodges.  A Dictionary of Surnames. Oxford University Press, 1989.Hanks, Patrick.  Dictionary of American Family Names. Oxford University Press, 2003.Reaney, P.H.  A Dictionary of English Surnames. Oxford University Press, 1997.Smith, Elsdon C.  American Surnames. Genealogical Publishing Company, 1997.

Comparing Dover Beach and Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock...

A Comparison of the Victorian and Modernist Perceptions as Exemplified by Dover Beach and The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock Matthew Arnold and T.S. Eliot, in their respective poems, share a sense of alienation, not only from other people but from nature and God as well. Arnold is writing in an age when the place of man in the universe is coming into question, for the first time since the advent of Christianity. He can no longer take the same solace in nature and the love of God that his Romantic predecessors did. While Arnold comments on isolation, however, he still addresses himself to a lover in Dover Beach, whereas Prufrock is presented as a man who has completely retreated within himself. Eliots isolation is total. In†¦show more content†¦Nature no longer retains its importance in an era where the precepts of the Bible are being widely questioned. Romantics admired the natural world not only because it was beautiful of itself, but because it was a constant reminder of the presence of Gods hand everywhere. Such revelations as Darwins theory of evolution, and the discovery of a geologic record indicating that the Earth is much older than formerly imagined, make all Biblical history, and therefore the Christian god himself, suspect. Human beings are no longer central to the workings of the universe -- we, along with everything else that once seemed a wonderful creation, are now merely the results of genetic serendipity. This is what J. Alfred Prufrock means when he says he has seen the moment of [his] greatness flicker. This scientific perception of eternity, which was deeply entrenched in the popular psyche by Eliots time, creates blind panic in Mr. Prufrock. Eliot also anticipates the nondiscriminatory view of death that was realized during the Great War. The realization that Prufrocks life is a mere eyeblink in history fills him with a kind of hysteria that there wont be any time for him, that he will be old far too soon. His wish to squeeze the universe into a ball might indicate a desire to retreat back into a smaller, more familiar world, where things were more certain. Like anyone whoShow MoreRelatedThe Love Song Of J. Alfred Prufrock986 Words   |  4 PagesIn The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock by T. S. Eliot and Dover Beach by Matthew Arnold the poets utilizes poetic devices to convey their respective themes. Through use of symbols and metaphors, the speaker in The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock displays his fears of the changes brought with the younger generation, and isolation from the changing society. The speaker in Dover Beach, utilizes symbols, metaphors, and similes to state that the younger generation has less faith than the older, and society

Conformity Free Essays

The Price of Nonconformity Defiance is a daring and bold resistance to authority or society. In any group, whether a neighborhood, team, or school, there is a certain ethical and moral code that people are expected to abide by, and therefore defiance is not welcome. However, every group has its individuals, people who break the mold and go against the grain. We will write a custom essay sample on Conformity or any similar topic only for you Order Now Actions made by individuals that shake the foundations of a society’s beliefs are seen in negative light, and as a result, the individual faces animosity. Nonconformity and defiance to a society’s customs lead to great implications for the individual. In the novel The Chocolate War, Jerry’s friendship with Roland Goubert deteriorates in correlation with Jerry’s nonconformity. Popularly referred to as â€Å"The Goober,† Roland is Jerry’s only real ally in the novel. The Goober is a peaceful figure who hates strain and contention and gets along with Jerry who shares Goober’s mild behavior (Cormier 100). The chocolate sale, however, drives a wedge between the two’s easy friendship. Goober responds with fear and apprehension when Jerry relates his plan to refuse the chocolates. He entreats Jerry to appease the school and sell the chocolates, and Jerry’s empty response to Goober’s plea starts the division in their friendship. â€Å"Jerry’s lone protest is partly inspired by a poster displayed in the back of his Buda 2 locker. It shows a man walking alone on the beach, with a captioned quote from poet T. S. Eliot: ‘Do I dare disturb the universe? ’ Beyond answering this challenge Jerry has no satisfactory explanation for his friend The Goober, or for himself, as to why he is still refusing to sell the chocolates† (Telgen). As a result, Goober refuses to participate on the football team, which greatly upsets Jerry and widens the fissure between them. After sharing their conflicting positions on the way to the bus stop one morning, the two feel separated. â€Å"They sat in sadness. Finally, they gathered their books, got up, and walked in silence to the bus stop† (Cormier 160). One’s nonconformity can also cause him to be subjected to psychological warfare. Archie Costello has a keen and disturbing talent for inflicting psychological damage on his subjects. Because Jerry defies the Vigils, Archie focuses his â€Å"talent† on Jerry. Jerry receives frequent, anonymous phones calls at all hours of the night. When Jerry answers, there is only silence; and then the people on the other line chuckle, privately, at some intimate joke (Cormier 191). This scheme proves very effective in penetrating into Jerry’s mind. â€Å"In bed once more, small in the dark, Jerry willed his body to loosen, to relax. After a while, sleep plucked at him with soft fingers, soothing away the ache. But the phone rang in his dreams all night long† (Cormier 220). The morning after his first night phone call, Jerry goes to his locker and finds that someone vandalized his poster and slashed his shoes. His poster that inspired his nonconformity had been smeared with something that appeared to be blue paint, and the message had been virtually obliterated into a grotesque jumble of unconnected letters (Cormier 192). After this event, Jerry feels as if someone is trying to send him a deliberate message. Archie further psychologically attacks Jerry by secretly taking Jerry’s homework assignment after he turns it in. Jerry claims he left his watercolor project on the teacher’s desk the day before, but Buda 3 the substitute, Brother Andrew, doubts him. â€Å"Jerry sighed quietly, in resignation. He knew that brother Andrew wouldn’t find the drawing there. He wanted to turn, to scan the faces of the kids in the class, to find that one kid who’d be gloating in satisfaction. Hey, you’re getting paranoid, he told himself† (Cormier 195). Despite all the plots against him, Jerry decides to keep disturbing the universe. Unfortunately, more problems inevitably follow as Jerry becomes firm in his conviction. Jerry is made an outcast in the eyes of the students at Trinity. Archie states that nobody defines the Vigils and gets away with it (Cormier 148). As one method of punishing Jerry, the Vigils make a point of separating Jerry and turning him into an outsider. The Vigils achieve this by interfering with the chocolate sale. The Vigils rally school support for the chocolate sale and make sure every boy meets his quota of fifty boxes except for Jerry (Peck). Jerry also starts to feel that he is invisible at school. As he walks through the corridors, students give him a wide berth. Nobody brushes against him, and guys step out of his path. Jerry believes that the teachers are part of the conspiracy too. They let their eyes slide over him, looking elsewhere when Jerry tried to catch their attention. Once, he waved his hand frantically to answer a question but the teacher ignored him† (Cormier 224). At first, Jerry feels like someone is trying to obliterate him and remove all traces of his existence, but after a while he begins to enjoy his absence of identity. Jerry relaxes, feeling as if he no longer has to be on his guard. His feelings of security, however, disappear when the students drop the cold shoulder act and move on to a much worse form of punishment. Buda 4 Often, it is only a matter a time before a nonconformist faces violence. Jerry realizes that the football field becomes a place where people can abuse him unmercifully. The athletic department provides for the testing of individuals, including each one’s willingness and ability to withstand physical abuse; the football field is an arena where violence is ritualized, sanctioned, and even demanded (Carter, Harris). At football practice one day, Jerry gets viciously tackled from behind, and he wonders who attacked him (â€Å"The Chocolate War†). Emile Janza also sets out to hurt Jerry and assembles a group of kids for an attack. Emile confronts Jerry alone after football practice. Emile calls Jerry a fairy, and when Jerry returns with crude remark Emile’s band of kids emerge from their hiding places to beat up Jerry. Emile and Jerry’s battle with each other reaches its height when Archie sets them both up to participate in a boxing match in front of the entire student body. â€Å"The undercurrent of physical bullying in the school, represented by Emile Janza, encourages our expectation that the larger battle will end in a key confrontation† (Peck). Archie puts a spin on the fight; he creates a raffle that dictates the moves of the boxing match, making it practically impossible for Jerry to win. Voices overwhelmingly cry from the crowd of students for Janza to kill his opponent. Jerry is alone out there, at the mercy of the students who recently decided that he was not a revolutionary at all, but rather someone who considered himself better than them (â€Å"The Chocolate War). Artists, including musicians and painters, have recognized and addressed the hardships and isolation of nonconformists in their works. The song â€Å"Minority† by the American band Green Day exemplifies an individual’s nonconformity. The lyrics â€Å"Stepped out of the line like a sheep runs from the herd† (Metro Lyrics), imply that an individual is rebelling against a group. The word â€Å"herd† suggests a like-minded group that acts together and therefore is robbed of their Buda 5 individuality. â€Å"A face in the crowd unsung, against the mold. Without a doubt singled out the only way I know† (Metro Lyrics). These lyrics demonstrate the isolation one faces as a result of nonconformity. If someone is â€Å"Marching out of time† (Metro Lyrics), they are turned into a minority, as evident in Jerry’s case when students treat him as an outsider. The painting, â€Å"Wake up America† by American artist Jon McNaughton symbolizes going against society. The painting makes a political statement while also expressing the idea of defiance. â€Å"There are all types of people bound together by the same problem we all face: our national debt. But strangely enough, most people don’t even seem to realize what is happening to them† (McNaughton). The people in this painting are bound by the national debt just like the students at Trinity are bound by the chocolate sale. The Trinity students carry out the sale unaware of its deeper purpose of keeping authority concentrated in the hands of Brother Leon. The painting suggests that Obama is like Leon in the sense that Obama gains power from the very debt that chains American taxpayers. The man in the foreground sawing off his chain is like Jerry breaking free from the grip of the chocolate sale. Like Jerry, the man escaping from the group will certainly face hostility. In fact, the woman behind him is already pointing him out to the group. For most individuals, protesting a society’s ethical and moral standards ultimately proves to be a losing battle. Even if a person fosters change among a group, it is only after facing numerous consequences. â€Å"Jerry’s protest is not easy for him to carry out, but he gains a new identity through his actions. What this idea becomes in the novel is the concept of being true to oneself and standing up to the evil that one perceives in the world. The only character that is true Buda 6 to himself in the novel is Jerry — but at a terrible price† (Peck). Individuals face conflict with the values of society or society at large as a result of an idea that they espouse or an action that they commit. Individuality may be described as the consciousness of the individual as to what he is and how he lives. The very essence of individuality is expression; the sense of dignity and independence is the soil wherein it thrives. Man’s thirst for liberation from authority and power will never be quenched despite the fact that society operates against people who refuse to conform. Consequences such as isolation, emotional damage, and violence are the price an individual must pay along his quest for freedom from every shackle. How to cite Conformity, Papers Conformity Free Essays Asch’s Study on Conformity The following essay will briefly outline Solomon Asch’s classic study on conformity (Asch, S. E. ,1956). We will write a custom essay sample on Conformity or any similar topic only for you Order Now , highlight the importance of the study in the field of psychology, ask if one gender tends to conform over another, explain the reasons why people conform to social norms and discuss the factors affecting conformity. Have you ever wondered why groups of teenagers dress and wear their hair so similarly? Or why people order the same dish as their partner at a restaurant? Or why people queue in an orderly fashion at the supermarket? These are all examples of social conformity and when you look closer at our social world, they are all around us. The aim of Solomon Asch’s conformity experiment (Baron, R. A. , Branscombe, N. R. , Byrne, D. , 2009) was to investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform. The experiment was conducted under laboratory conditions and involved only one real participant and 7 confederates. The real participant was unaware that there were confederates involved and was informed that it was a visual perception study. The participants had to match a standard line length to three comparison line lengths that were shown on two separate cards and announce their answer out loud. The 7 confederates were always first to answer, leaving the real participant last to act each time. On particular occasions (12 out of 18), known as clinical trials, the confederates unanimously chose a comparison line that was clearly incorrect. Each participant took part in the experiment several times. The results showed (Baron et al. , 2009) that over the course of several studies 76 % of the participants conformed with the rest of the group’s incorrect answers at least once and 37% of the participants went along with the confederate’s incorrect consensus overall. Asch also put a control group in place where adversely only 5% made such errors. In later experiments, Asch slightly varied the conditions of the experiment where one of the confederates answered correctly, agreeing with the real participant. This broke the group’s unanimity and conformity dropped to 5%. â€Å"Apparently, a single ally is all you need to â€Å"stick to your guns† and resist the pressure to conform† (Hock, R. , 2004). Further research (Morris, W. N. , Miller, R. S. , Spangenberg, S. , 1977) supports this, whereby the experiment was recreated with 1 of the confederates giving the correct answer, going against the group consensus. The researchers found that the level of conformity depended on at what stage the confederate agreed with the participant’s correct answer, early or late in the process. It now seems clear that early agreement with one’s implicit response serves to solidify or strengthen the implicit response, making conformity less likely† (Morris et al. , 1977). Further research (Asch, S. E. ,1956). , also showed that when the participant did not say his answer out loud but wrote it down, the level of conformity dropped. â€Å"Often, it appears, we follow social norms overtly but don’t actually change our private views† (Maas, A. , ; Clark, R. D. III, 1984 as cited in Social Psychology, Baron et al. ). This shows the distinction between public conformity and private acceptance. Asch’s study on conformity was important in the field of psychology because â€Å"the real power of social pressure to conform was demonstrated clearly and scientifically for the first time† (Hock, R. , 2004). Many researchers (Crutchfield, R. S. ,1955, Morris et al. , 1977, Mori, K. , ; Arai, M. , 2010) that have reconstructed Asch’s original study or conducted similar studies support the original findings for the most part. A very clever variation of the study was devised (Mori et al. 2010) without the use of confederates whereby the participants wore two types of polarized sunglasses during the critical trials which depending on the filtering of green or magenta at the top of the comparison lines would make the lines longer or shorter. This study used both men and women where Asch’s experiment only involved men. â€Å"The results showed that, in line with Asch’s basic f indings, the minority women participants conformed to the majority. However, the study produced two different results: While minority women conformed, minority men did not. Contrary to Asch’s findings, the frequency of conformity of minority participants was almost the same regardless of whether the majority answered unanimously or not† (Mori et al. , 2010). This asks the question whether men and women differ in their tendency to conform. Researchers (Sistrunk, F. , ; McDavid, J. W. ,1971) carried out an experiment to try and find out if one gender has a tendency to conform more than another. The researchers concluded that gender did not affect the likelihood to conform but â€Å"a disregard for particular characteristics of the ehaving male or female together with the particular nature of the judgmental tasks which have been employed in experimental studies of conformity may have contributed to artificially inflated observations of sex-determined differences† (Sistrunk et al. ) But why do people conform? Asch interviewed the participants of his experiment afterwards and asked them why they went along with the general consensus of th e group. Many of the participants simply replied because they did not want to feel stupid or embarrassed. This supports the theory (League, B. , ; Jackson, D. N. , 1964) of the connection between conformity and self-esteem. â€Å"Research in the area of conformity generally supports the hypothesis that persons with low self-value tend to be more conformant to social pressures than persons with high self-value† (League, B. , ; Jackson, D. N. , 1964). Other factors that can increase conformity are the cohesiveness of the group. There is a mounting body of evidence (Crandall, C. S. , 1988, Latane, B. , ; L’Herrou, T. 1996) that suggests that the more attracted or committed to the group you are a part of, the more likely you are to conform. Two groups of college girls in sororities were studied (Crandall, C. S. , 1988) with respect to popularity patterns and binge eating. In sorority alpha the further from the mean level of binge eating was correlated with being less popular. In sorority beta the more the women binged the more popular she was. â€Å"Most important, however, is the correlation which directly indicates social influence:  Women became more like their friends over time. (Crandall, C. S. , 1988). Another factor that can influence conformity is the size of the group. Conformity was originally thought by researchers (Gerard, H. B. , Wilhemly, R. A. , Conolley, E. S. , 1968) to increase with group size but it would seem to plateau up to three or more members. â€Å"The major hypothesis of the present study, which was not supported, was that the independent condition would show a linear increase in conformity through all group sizes† (Gerard et al. ). But later research (Bond, R. , Smith, P. B. , 1996), a meta-analysis of 133 Asch-like line judgement studies from 17 countries showed that conformity tends to increase up to 8 group members and then level off. The meta-analysis conducted by (Bond et al. , 1996) was to examine whether conformity has changed over time and whether culture plays a significant role in conformity levels. The results (focusing on analysis conducted only in the U. S. ) showed that â€Å"levels of conformity in general had steadily declined since Asch’s studies in the early 1950s† (Bond et al. , 1996). The hypothesis that conformity in collectivist cultures (China, Asia) would be higher than in individualistic cultures (US, Europe) from analyses of cultural values from studies (Hofstede, 1980,  1983,  Schwartz, 1994, Trompenaars, 1993) was confirmed. â€Å"Moreover, the impact of the cultural variables was greater than any other, including those moderator variables such as majority size typically identified as being important factors. Cultural values, it would seem, are significant mediators of response in group pressure experiments† (Bond et al. , 1996) To summarise, Asch’s study on conformity (Asch, S. E. , 1956) shows that social pressure from a majority group can affect a person to conform. Asch and others (Morris et al. 1977) also show that if the unanimity of the group is broken, conformity decreases and (Maas et al. , 1984) distinguishes between public commitment and private acceptance. There have been conflicting studies (Mori et al. , 2010, Sistrunk et al. 1971) on whether one gender conforms more than another. Research suggests that there are many reasons for conformity; if one has low self-esteem (League et al. 1964), the cohesiveness of the group (Crandall et al. , 1988, Latane et al. , 1996), the size of the group (although there is conflicting research) (Gerard et al. , 1968, Bond et al. , 1996). To conclude, there is research (Bond et al. , 1996) to suggest that conformity in the U. S. has decreased since Asch’s original study and that in collectivistic cultures there are higher levels of conformity than in individualistic ones. References Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General And Applied,  70(9), 1-70. doi:10. 1037/h0093718 Baron, R. A. , Branscombe, N. R. , ; Byrne, D. (2009). Social Psychology  (12th ed. ). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Bond, R. , ; Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin,  119(1), 111-137. doi:10. 1037/0033-2909. 119. 1. 111 Crandall, C. S. (1988). Social contagion of binge eating. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology,  55(4), 588-598. doi:10. 1037/0022-3514. 55. 4. 88 Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist,  10(5), 191-198. doi:10. 1037/h0040237 Gerard, H. B. , Wilhemly, R. A. , Conolley, E. S. (1968). Conformity And Group Size. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology,  8(11), 79-82. doi:10. 1037/h0025325 Hock, Roger R. (2004). Forty Studies that Changed Psychology  : Explorations into the History of Psychological Research ( 5th Edition). Prentice Hall. ISBN  0-13-114729-3. Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures consequences:  International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA:  Sage. As cited in Bond, R. , Smith, P. B. (1996) Latane, B. , L’Herrou, T. (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology,  70(6), 1218-1230. doi:10. 1037/0022-3514. 70. 6. 1218 League, B. , ; Jackson, D. N. (1964). Conformity, veridicality, and self-esteem. The Journal Of Abnormal And Social Psychology,  68(1), 113-115. doi:10. 1037/h0047230 Maas, A. , ; Clark, R. D. III, (1984). Hidden Impact of Minorities: Fifteen Years of Minority Influence Research. Psychology Bulletin, 95, 233-243 as cited in Social Psychology Mori, K. , ; Arai, M. (2010). No need to fake it: Reproduction of the Asch experiment without confederates. International Journal Of Psychology,  45(5), 390-397. doi:10. 1080/00207591003774485 Morris, W. N. , Miller, R. S. , ; Spangenberg, S. (1977). The effects of dissenter position and task difficulty on conformity and response conflict. Journal Of Personality,  45(2), 251-266. doi:10. 1111/j. 1467-6494. 1977. tb00150. x Sistrunk, F. , ; McDavid, J. W. (1971). Sex variable in conforming behavior. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology,  17(2), 200-207. doi:10. 1037/h0030382 Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Cultural dimensions of values:  Towards an understanding of national differences. In U. Kim H. C. Triandis C. Kagitcibasi S. C. Choi ; G. Yoon (Eds. ),  Individualism and collectivism:  Theory, method and applications  (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA:  Sage. As cited in Bond, R. , ; Smith, P. B. (1996) Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. London:  Economist Books. As cited in Bond, R. , ; Smith, P. B. (1996) How to cite Conformity, Essay examples Conformity Free Essays One of society popular issues – conformity, is the act of one individual likely to change his or her thoughts, behaviors, and attitudes in order to fit in a group or to follow social norms. Norms are understood as unspoken, invisible rules appeared by a group of people then spread out to the whole community. Conformity occurs in various environment and situations, which fashion trends, plastic surgery, and tattooed people are some typical examples (depends on the case). We will write a custom essay sample on Conformity or any similar topic only for you Order Now Furthermore, when talking about the place where conformity rules over, is which we are most familiar with: the school. First of all, we can possibly see that school managers, staffs and teachers are the ones who directly apply conformity on students. Rules and punishments which are thought to organize and unite everyone but the reality is reverse. These excessive and unreasonable ones constrain student from freedom, that later on make them afraid Of schools, studying, and conform hopelessly although their brain are opposing. Plus, the approach of rigid and severe educating nowadays leads to reducing curiosity and creativity in students. This problem happens in not one but many different countries, hence takes art in declining the developing education. Besides, there is still a minority of teachers who are stubborn enough to reject any students’ new innovative resolutions so as to protect their ego. Yet another outcome of the conformity doctrine is standardized examinations. â€Å"Future of the humanity’ should be tested on their personalized and specific abilities to prepare for life, not just narrow and impractical plain papers to figuratively test our memory – which then disappears like it never happens! It may be exaggerated but somehow, schools have made us involved in either a batch or flow production, waiting or an acceptable diploma to apply for ordinary jobs with and expectation of getting average income†¦ In another aspect, students ourselves are conformist as well. From observation, there are mainly three considerable reasons why students conform, and one of them is lacking of knowledge. In a group work or class period, those who are not as clever as others usually listen to everything discussed or lecture assuming they are all correct. They make themselves lower than their friends, follow orders when doing a project, or obey the rules unconditionally. The second type are whom we can sibyl call â€Å"trend followers†. These individuals are the one who would buy a pair of shoes that has similar brand to other majorities in school; put on sweaters in a boiling temperature of 35 ‘C because fashion icons in Russia wear them; or even mimic the same tattoo as their idols’. Their needs of affection and admiration from others resulting in conformity that they want to mimic everything from the loved ones! Finally, the third and also why students conform is that they are yearning to be protected: they would avoid any action leads to disagreement or making them an outcast. Anything that mess harmful is always on their black-list including arguments, bullying, criticism therefore they ignore their individuality to make themselves be like the majority. We can find these kind of students everywhere: agree on every decision made despite of having different opinion; suddenly draw back their arms after seeing no one raises theirs up; or more unintelligible like one claiming he or she has not finish the assignment – which is supposed to be done already, just because there are few people have completed the task. Overall, how conformity affects education – beneficially or contrary, is still beatable. To consider in a positive way, the fact that conformity provides cooperation and acceptance is undeniable. It keeps students from engaging in anti-social acts for fear of isolation plus ensures security. Conformity is metaphorically like an established path for us to follow without deliberation and therefore make a great assistance since we are not capable of everything. Moreover, besides self-completing, it also maintains social norms, discipline, and easily operates school via ‘obedient kids’. However, many argue that conformity brings up more draw backs than its advantages. Taking as an example: the school bell. When it rings, the whole school jointly moves to another location to start another activity as now it is controlled by an audio signal. Clearly, there are logistical issues to consider if we are to safely and effectively manage a volatile school population of over SHOO young people, but are there any less militaristic ways to operate? When will we see schools acting less like prisons or military bases, and more like places where learning can actually be enjoyed? It is clear that schools should be founded on diversity not on conformity. Yet to achieve this involves not only a strong consideration of the development of individuals and their specific abilities, but also on the need for each school to create its own distinct identity within its community. It is not only the school’s duty to apply conformity properly but also our accurate perception that does. Do you want to become one of a mass chain of approximate dolls that people always see you as one tiny part of a group, or a distinct star shining in the dark sky? Whether good or not, remember that being yourself is the best! How to cite Conformity, Papers

Jerome Salinger Essays - J. D. Salinger, Franny And Zooey

Jerome Salinger Born on January 1, 1919, Jerome David Salinger was to become one of America's greatest contemporary authors. In 1938 Salinger briefly attended Ursinus College in Pennsylvania where he wrote a column, "Skipped Diploma," which featured movie reviews for his college newspaper. Salinger made his writing debut when he published his first short story, "The Young Folks," in Whit Burnett's Story magazine (French, xiii). He was paid only twenty-five dollars. In 1939, at the age of 20, Salinger had not acquired any readers. He later enrolled in a creative writing class at Columbia University. Salinger was very much interested in becoming an actor and a playwright, which was quite odd because he would later in life become a recluse (Wenke, 3). Salinger adjusted his writing style to fit the literary marketplace. He was writing for money and began writing for magazines like Good Housekeeping and Mademoiselle. Many of Salinger's characters have unique character traits. "Salinger presents a number of stories that consider characters who become involved in degrading, often phony social contexts," states a major critic (Wenke, 7). These characters are often young and have experienced a lot of emotional turmoil. They have been rejected by society and mainly categorized as "misfits." This alienation of the personality is often viewed as a sign of weakness by society when in fact the outcasts ultimately gain strength from their experiences as shown in Nine Stories, The Catcher in the Rye, and Franny and Zooey. Salinger is telling a tale of the human condition in its reality through his novels. Nine Stories is a collection of short stories of people who are uncertain of the next path to take in life. They are lonely, needy, and searching for love. One of these stories, "A Perfect Day for Bananafish," is the story of a young couple who try to understand their life together and the true meaning of love. Seymour Glass has just been released from the Army Hospital and he is unable to adjust to life with his "crass wife Muriel amidst the lavish and vulgar atmosphere of their post-war second honeymoon" (Gwynn & Blotner, 19). It has often been called"the loveless tunnel of love." Salinger portrays Muriel in the first part of the story as superficial. She believes that everything and everyone operates on her time: She was a girl who for a ringing phone dropped exactly nothing. She looked as if her phone had been ringing continually ever since she had reached puberty. Muriel has an indifferent attitude about life. She seems simple and very insecure. Muriel finds it funny that her husband calls her "Miss Spiritual Tramp of 1948." This tells the reader that she lacks self- esteem. Her simple attitude shows when she is talking to her mother on the phone about going to Bingo one night: "Anyway, after Bingo he and his wife asked me if I wouldn't like to join them for a drink. So I did. His wife was horrible. You remember that awful dinner dress we saw in Bonwit's window? The one you said that you'd have to have a tiny, tiny." Muriel implies that she disliked the lady because of what she was wearing. She alienates herself from society by believing that she is better that everyone else. Because of Muriel's personality, Seymour cannot confide in her or feel any love in his marriage. This is why he turns to the little girl at the beach for companionship. Seymour finds a friend and a listener in Sybil. But the friendship of Sybil cannot mend Seymour's broken heart. He gains some strength in himself when he finds a friend in Sybil, but he cannot seem to get past his failed marriage. Seymour is so desperate for love that he commits suicide: Then he went over to one of the pieces of luggage, opened it, and from under a pile of shorts and undershirts he took out an Ortgies caliber 7.65 automatic. He released the magazine, looked at it, then reinserted it. He cocked the piece. Then he went over and sat down on the unoccupied twin bed, looked at the girl, aimed the pistol and fired a bullet through his right temple. "Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut" is a story about a young woman who tries to make sense out of all the confusion in her life. Eloise finds a loyal and trustworthy friend in Mary Jane. They are on the same path in life. Salinger suggests that they have stayed friends for so long because neither of them graduated from Jerome Salinger Essays - J. D. Salinger, Franny And Zooey Jerome Salinger Born on January 1, 1919, Jerome David Salinger was to become one of America's greatest contemporary authors. In 1938 Salinger briefly attended Ursinus College in Pennsylvania where he wrote a column, "Skipped Diploma," which featured movie reviews for his college newspaper. Salinger made his writing debut when he published his first short story, "The Young Folks," in Whit Burnett's Story magazine (French, xiii). He was paid only twenty-five dollars. In 1939, at the age of 20, Salinger had not acquired any readers. He later enrolled in a creative writing class at Columbia University. Salinger was very much interested in becoming an actor and a playwright, which was quite odd because he would later in life become a recluse (Wenke, 3). Salinger adjusted his writing style to fit the literary marketplace. He was writing for money and began writing for magazines like Good Housekeeping and Mademoiselle. Many of Salinger's characters have unique character traits. "Salinger presents a number of stories that consider characters who become involved in degrading, often phony social contexts," states a major critic (Wenke, 7). These characters are often young and have experienced a lot of emotional turmoil. They have been rejected by society and mainly categorized as "misfits." This alienation of the personality is often viewed as a sign of weakness by society when in fact the outcasts ultimately gain strength from their experiences as shown in Nine Stories, The Catcher in the Rye, and Franny and Zooey. Salinger is telling a tale of the human condition in its reality through his novels. Nine Stories is a collection of short stories of people who are uncertain of the next path to take in life. They are lonely, needy, and searching for love. One of these stories, "A Perfect Day for Bananafish," is the story of a young couple who try to understand their life together and the true meaning of love. Seymour Glass has just been released from the Army Hospital and he is unable to adjust to life with his "crass wife Muriel amidst the lavish and vulgar atmosphere of their post-war second honeymoon" (Gwynn & Blotner, 19). It has often been called"the loveless tunnel of love." Salinger portrays Muriel in the first part of the story as superficial. She believes that everything and everyone operates on her time: She was a girl who for a ringing phone dropped exactly nothing. She looked as if her phone had been ringing continually ever since she had reached puberty. Muriel has an indifferent attitude about life. She seems simple and very insecure. Muriel finds it funny that her husband calls her "Miss Spiritual Tramp of 1948." This tells the reader that she lacks self- esteem. Her simple attitude shows when she is talking to her mother on the phone about going to Bingo one night: "Anyway, after Bingo he and his wife asked me if I wouldn't like to join them for a drink. So I did. His wife was horrible. You remember that awful dinner dress we saw in Bonwit's window? The one you said that you'd have to have a tiny, tiny." Muriel implies that she disliked the lady because of what she was wearing. She alienates herself from society by believing that she is better that everyone else. Because of Muriel's personality, Seymour cannot confide in her or feel any love in his marriage. This is why he turns to the little girl at the beach for companionship. Seymour finds a friend and a listener in Sybil. But the friendship of Sybil cannot mend Seymour's broken heart. He gains some strength in himself when he finds a friend in Sybil, but he cannot seem to get past his failed marriage. Seymour is so desperate for love that he commits suicide: Then he went over to one of the pieces of luggage, opened it, and from under a pile of shorts and undershirts he took out an Ortgies caliber 7.65 automatic. He released the magazine, looked at it, then reinserted it. He cocked the piece. Then he went over and sat down on the unoccupied twin bed, looked at the girl, aimed the pistol and fired a bullet through his right temple. "Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut" is a story about a young woman who tries to make sense out of all the confusion in her life. Eloise finds a loyal and trustworthy friend in Mary Jane. They are on the same path in life. Salinger suggests that they have stayed friends for so long because neither of them graduated from